Today, Google announced they were adding Git support to Google Code. This is certainly the most requested feature, and one I've been patiently waiting on. I move from Google Code's SVN repositories to GitHub's Git repositories almost 2 years ago. I love GitHub, but frankly, I'd rather have one less account to worry about and move over to Google Code with a few projects. Both have their advantages, and I'm not completely entirely convinced Google Code is better, but we will see.
As for the comparison between GitHub and Google Code, I miss the ability to follow projects like you can in GitHub. However, Google Code provides many methods to follow a project in "Project Feeds". They can be found at http://code.google.com/p/PROJECT/feeds, such as Atom feeds of project updates, wiki updates, issues, source changes, etc. This allows you to integrate the updates into your existing tools, such as Google Reader, rather than going to the GitHub website. I will probably keep my account just for that. So far, I haven't found the same functionality in Google Code. The wikis seems about the same. Google code does have a similar function to GitHub's forking and pull request with clone and code review. Google seems to have integrated their Gerrit project for code review, which I've heard is fantastic for merging code, and is used extensively for the Android project, which is also run on Git. Google Code does provide 4GB of space per free project, where as GitHub only provides 300MB, though that can be adjusted with an email to their support. GitHub has a way to download the current source as a .zip or .tar.gz, which Google seems to be lacking. Google Code does have a way to script your uploads, which I like very much. They provide an easy way to use Python to upload files for download. I think this is handy, because I have always wished for a build server to work with GitHub more easily. This could easily be used to build .deb or .rpm packages and have them uploaded and downloaded by users. There are some methods to do this with GitHub, but none provided by the company themselves.
We are going to copy up all the history and branches from our projects. If we just copied the files into the new cloned Google repository, we'd only have the files, and no history. First, head over tocreate a new Google Code project. Create your project as normal, selecting Git as your version control system. Now, head to the terminal, so we can avoid typing in our password all the time.
nano ~/.netrc ----- machine code.google.com login YOUR_LOGIN password YOUR_PASSWORD ----- chmod 500 ~/.netrc
This will create a file that is used each time you try to interact with Google's Git server, containing your login details. By chmod'ing it, no one but you should be able to read or write it.
Now head into your existing GitHub repository. If you don't have it locally on your machine, just clone the repository like so:
git clone firstname.lastname@example.org:username/example_project.git
We are going to add the Google server as a new repository, and from there we will clone each branch into the Google repository. This is kind of a pain, but I did not see an easier way to clean each branch. Hopefully someone can prove me wrong.
# Move into the Git directory we just cloned. cd example_project # I'm going to call the new repository "google". I never much liked "origin". git remote add google https://code.google.com/p/example_project/ # Push all branches to the google repository git push google --all # Optional: Remove old repo, assuming your GitHub repo is called origin git remote rm origin # If you're hung up on the name "origin" you can rename the repo nano .git/config ----- # Change: [remote "google"] # To: [remote "origin"]
That's everything. If you want a more in depth look at how to use Git, check out my Git Guide, which has a bunch of shortcuts and a link to an even better article.